Friday, February 6, 2026

US TROOPS IN NIGERIA: WE SEEK CLARIFICATIONS - MURIC

 


‎‎ MUSLIM RIGHTS CONCERN (MURIC)

‎هيئة حقوق المسلمين

‎Motto: Dialogue, Not Violence

‎6th February, 2026

‎‎ PRESS RELEASE:

US TROOPS IN NIGERIA: WE SEEK CLARIFICATIONS - MURIC

‎The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has requested for clarifications over the presence of American troops in Nigeria. The group expressed concern for the safety of Muslim leaders in particular and the sovereignty of Nigeria in general. It interrogated US goal of protecting Nigerian Christians and also called on Nigerian leaders to take hold of the nation's destiny.

‎‎This was contained in a statement circulated to the media on Friday, 6th February, 2026 by the Executive Director of the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), Professor Ishaq Akintola.

‎‎The full statement reads:

‎‎"The United States of America confirmed three days ago that its troops were already on ground in Nigeria (https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/us-military-says-some-forces-have-been-dispatched-nigeria-2026-02-03/).

‎‎"The Federal Government (FG) also confirmed this later on the same day (https://dailytrust.com/dhq-admits-us-troops-in-nigeria/?noamp=aavailablehttps://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/pidgin/articles/) although the Defence Minister, General Christopher Musa, later said they were 'not combat forces' (https://businessday.ng/news/article/us-troops-in-nigeria-are-not-combat-forces-says-defence-minister/)

‎‎"MURIC considers this development as an overreach and the secrecy surrounding US troop deployment to Nigeria disturbing. While we welcome cooperation between Nigeria and the US in the fight against terrorism, we do not think US boots on ground is necessary. In the first place, we regard it as a discriminatory, and selective response of the US to the question of religious persecution in Nigeria.

“We assert that there is nothing like Christian genocide in Nigeria. What we have is terrorism, insecurity and religious persecution on both sides of Christians and Muslims and what we lack is religious tolerance.

“For greater clarity, Muslims in Southern Nigeria have been suffering from religious persecution in the hands of their Christian compatriots for decades if not centuries. These persecutions are legendary although the Nigerian authorities have turned deaf ears to their cries to date. But Southern Muslims have not taken it upon themselves to falsely accuse their Christian counterparts of ‘Muslim genocide’.

“The case of terrorism and other issues of insecurity are another cup of tea and it affects Nigerians of all faith. It therefore beggars belief that America, a nation regarded as the champion of democracy, freedom and equal rights will descend on Nigeria to selectively fight or ‘protect’ one group.

“If the US should promote democratic principles of freedom of religion in Nigeria at all, it has a moral duty not to be selective but to promote freedom for both Christians and Muslims who are in captivity. There should be no selective solutions to religious persecution anywhere in the world.

“If, therefore, it is true that US troops are already on ground in Nigeria, we demand that there should be no clampdown on religious activities of Muslims or on Muslim leaders. No Muslim leader should disappear or be assassinated and no renditions.

“We note that the Federal Government (FG) called the American forces on ground a 'small team'. But even that ‘small team’ of US troops in Nigeria amounts to the presence of a Christian Army in view of the emphasis given the goal of US invasion embodied in US President Trump's pre-strike and pre-US-troops’ deployment rhetoric (protecting Nigerian Christians).

“‎Against this backdrop, the perception of Nigerian Muslims (and the global Muslim community) concerning the presence of US troops in Nigeria would have been different if America's stated goal ab initio had been to protect law abiding Nigerians (including people of all faiths) to eliminate terrorists and to stop the spate of killings generally.

“‎But the stated objective of protecting Christians only makes any American boot on ground in Nigeria a Christian Army (with all its implications). It also constitutes a threat to global peace as many people around the world, especially Muslims now see the presence of American troops in the country as an attempt to intimidate the Nigerian majority Muslim population.

“Millions of Southern Muslims have been forcefully converted to Christianity, particularly in the South West while thousands of Muslims in the South East face the threat of death unless they converted to Christianity. A new video clip which emerged last week showed a Christian militant from the South East inciting Christians to kill any Muslim they see around. Hundreds of Muslims have been killed in the South East in the past ten years.

“Those Muslims in Southern Nigeria who have persevered in the face of persecution in the hands of their Christian neighbours and those who have also resisted attempts at forced conversion will find it difficult to believe that the ‘small team’ of US troops is not a Christian Army eventually deployed to force them to accept Christianity at gun point unless America waters down its pro-Christian and anti-Muslim rhetoric by using such language that reflects respect for the dignity of Nigerian Muslims. 

“In the same way that mainstream Nigerian Muslims will not surrender to terrorism, we will not give in to imperialist intimidation. What is happening today is not different from neo-imperialist terrorism. Already, some Nigerian Christians have started using the presence of US troops in Nigeria to harass Muslims in the country. This is absolutely unacceptable (https://www-vanguardngr-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.vanguardngr.com/2026/02/anti-terror-war-ex-militant-leader-warns-dokubo-gumi-over-reported-arrival-of-u-s-troops-in-nigeria/amp/).

While interviewing the son of a former Nigerian president who is a Muslim, an anchor lady on a popular Nigerian cable television network also said the US strike was targeted at Sokoto so as to emphasise the importance of a Christian cleric who lives in the city and to earn him more respect!

“We assert very firmly that Nigerian Muslims will hold the National Assembly (NASS) responsible for failing to ask the necessary questions. What part of the cooperation between Nigeria and the US necessitates the presence of US troops on Nigerian soil? Has the Nigerian Constitution been suspended? Was the NASS carried along? Why did the Federal Government (FG) fail to inform Nigerians about the plan? Who is paying for the operation, the accommodation of US troops, feeding, etc: Nigerian tax payers or US tax payers?

“‎Before we exit from this conversation, we note that the conspiratorial silence from the Nigerian civil society, students bodies, workers unions, etc on the issue of American troops on Nigerian soil is baffling. If these groups are silent because of the assumption that America has come for Nigerian Muslims only, we remind them of the words of Martin Niemöller, a German Lutheran pastor in the hands of Nazi Germany.

He said, ‘First they came for the communists and I did not speak out because I was not a communist. Then they came for the socialists and I did not speak out
because I was not a socialist. Then 
they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist. Then 
they came for the Jews and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak out for me’.

“By the way, FG described the presence of the American troops in the country as a

‎'small' team of American soldiers. This description needs to be interrogated. How 'small' is 'small'?

 

#USTroopsInNigeria

‎#NASS

#HowSmallIsSmall

 

‎Professor Ishaq Akintola,

‎Founder/Executive Director,

‎Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC).

 

210 MUSLIMS MASSACRED IN ONE DAY: MURIC KNOCKS CHRISTIAN GENOCIDE NARRATIVE

 


MUSLIM RIGHTS CONCERN (MURIC)

‎هيئة حقوق المسلمين

‎Motto: Dialogue, Not Violence

5th February, 2026

PRESS RELEASE:

210 MUSLIMS MASSACRED IN ONE DAY: MURIC KNOCKS CHRISTIAN GENOCIDE NARRATIVE

‎Sequel to the massacre of about 210 Muslims in Kwara and Katsina states yesterday, the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has accused promoters of the Christian genocide narrative of being bad judges and Satanic referees for closing their eyes on the killing of large numbers of Muslims while concentrating on what happened to Christians only. 

‎MURIC's accusation was contained in a press release circulated on Thursday, 5th February, 2026 by its Executive Director, Professor Ishaq Akintola. 

‎The full press release reads:

‎"About 175 Muslims were massacred in Woro town, Kwara State while another 35 Muslims were mercilessly shot and killed on Tuesday, 3rd February, 2026 in Doma village, Faskari Local Government, Ruwangodiya Constituency in the Northern part of Katsina State

‎(https://www.straitstimes.com/world/gunmen-kill-nearly-200-in-nigerias-kwara-and-katsina-attacks). 

‎"We are appalled by these senseless killings. We demand full protection for Nigerians of all faiths and ethnicities. Every Nigerian deserves Allah-given fundamental human right to life.  

‎"Section 14(2)(b), Chapter II of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria says, 'The security and welfare of the people shall be the primary purpose of government'. But Nigerian citizens are no longer safe. The killing of a single Nigerian is condemnable but what do we say when 210 citizens are massacred? This is one killing too many.  

"We therefore call on the Federal Government (FG) to protect all its citizens, including Muslims, Christians and traditionalists. We will not be parochial like those who ignore the killing of Muslims and are calling for the protection of Christians alone. Every life matters to us. Every Nigerian should be protected no matter the faith. 

‎"This is where America's vow and it's recurring refrain 'to protect Christians' alone in Nigeria assaults the psyche of the whole of humanity. It is petty, arrogant and disproportionately militant. America would have won the heart of the global community if it had declared an intention to stop indiscriminate killings in Nigeria but alas it came 'guns ablazing' to protect Christians only. This makes any American boot on ground in Nigeria a Christian Army with all its implications.  

‎"The latest massacre involving an astounding number of 210 Muslims has made a mince meat of the lopsided and malicious narratives of Christian genocide, particularly Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan's legal brief, Rev. Ezekiel Bwede Dachomo's superfluous dramatisation,  the hysterical and hypocritical tirade from Christian leaders of North Central Nigeria and the Nigerian media hype of same. 

‎"At the risk of sounding judgemental, all the above may be seen as bad judges and Satanic referees for closing their eyes on the killing of large numbers of Muslims while concentrating on what happened to Christians only.

‎"Now we must ask them all: is it still Christians alone who are being killed? We may also ask America, 'Is it Christian lives alone that matter? Are Muslims, Buddhists, Confucians, etc not homo sapiens? Won't the world as a whole be a safer place if all human beings are protected regardless of faith, race or colour?"

‎#210MuslimsKilled

‎#MuslimLivesMatter

‎#ProtectAllNigerians

‎#NotChristiansOnly

‎#NotMuslimsOnly

‎Professor Ishaq Akintola, 

‎Founder/Executive Director, 

‎Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC). 

 

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

MURIC TO NJC: GIVE US SHARI'AH EXPERTS IN COURT OF APPEAL

 


MUSLIM RIGHTS CONCERN (MURIC)

‎هيئة حقوق المسلمين

‎Motto: Dialogue, Not Violence

‎4th February, 2026

‎‎ PRESS RELEASE:

MURIC TO NJC: GIVE US SHARI'AH EXPERTS IN COURT OF APPEAL  

‎The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) has appealed to the National Judicial Council (NJC) to appoint Shari'ah experts into Courts of Appeal to enable informed and balanced dispensation of justice.

‎The appeal was contained in a statement issued on Wednesday, 4th February, 2026 by the Executive Director of the Islamic human rights group, Professor Ishaq Akintola.

‎The statement reads:

‎"For whereas the Nigerian Constitution provides for Shari'ah Courts of Appeal in Nigeria to be manned by those who are learned in Islamic Law, there has been no Shari'ah panel in the Court of Appeal for the past seven years.

‎"The same applies to the Supreme Court which also lacks adequate personnel for Shari'ah matters particularly since the exit of the former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Tanko Muhammad (2019-2022).

‎"Information reaching us affirms that the Court of Appeal of Nigeria has no Shari'ah panel to hear and determine matters of Islamic Law from the Shari'ah Court of Appeal of states practicing Shari'ah. Ditto for the Supreme Court.

‎"We stand to be corrected but it has been alleged that there is only one Shari'ah law expert in the entire Court of Appeal of Nigeria while there is none in the Supreme Court.

‎"This development has often caused unnecessary delay in the determination of Shari'ah-related matters while miscarriage of justice cannot be entirely ruled out if this trend continues.

‎"We are constrained to express deep disappointment over this phenomenon particularly because Nigeria is replete with Shari'ah experts of different categories. It is therefore strange to learn that the highest institutions for the dispensation of Justice has been stinted of qualified personnel. 

‎"We are equally alarmed that only one out of the 49 allegedly shortlisted candidates is a Shari'ah expert in the recruitment exercise recently conducted. Yet the single Shari'ah candidate was picked out of a long list of Qadis from different jurisdictions.

‎"MURIC appeals to the NJC to look into this with a view to ensuring that the only candidate shortlisted for Shari'ah is considered.

‎"By the same token, we appeal to the NJC to appoint qualified Muslims who are well versed in Islamic Law in its subsequent process of elevation to the Appellate Courts. This is because being a Muslim judge of the Appeal Court does not qualify one to determine matters relating to the Shari'ah which is an entirely different discipline."

 

#NJC

‎#CourtOfAppeal

#AppointShariahExperts

 

‎Professor Ishaq Akintola,

‎Founder/Executive Director,

‎Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC).

 

Saturday, January 31, 2026

AMUPITAN: CAN CANNOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE – MURIC

 


‎‎ MUSLIM RIGHTS CONCERN (MURIC)

‎هيئة حقوق المسلمين

‎Motto: Dialogue, Not Violence

‎31st January, 2026

‎‎PRESS RELEASE:

AMUPITAN: CAN CANNOT ADDRESS THE ISSUE – MURIC

‎An Islamic human rights group, the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), has lashed out at the northern wing of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) for defending the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Joash Amupitan, over the allegation of instigating the branding of Nigeria as a country of particular interest and orchestrating the fictitious and malicious Christian genocide narrative.

‎In a statement circulated to newsmen on Saturday, 31st January, 2026 by the Executive Director of the group, Professor Ishaq Akintola, MURIC slammed Northern CAN for ignoring the substance while pursuing the shadow.

‎The group continued:

‎"Two days ago, precisely on Thursday, 29th January, 2026, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Northern wing, defended the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over the allegation of instigating the branding of Nigeria as a country of particular interest and orchestrating a fictitious and malicious Christian genocide narrative.

‎"In a press release signed on the issue, the Chairman of Northern CAN, Reverend Joseph John Hayab and the Secretary General, Bishop Mohammed Naga, accused the Supreme Council for Shari'ah in Nigeria (SCSN) of politicising religion. This was in response to the Council's demand for Amupitan's sack. (https://guardian.ng/news/can-condemns-shariah-councils-call-to-remove-amupitan/).

‎"What we know of mature groups is that they confront issues directly and address them as presented while objective people review situations and separate emotions from facts. But in this case, CAN has elected to put its weight behind sentiment rather than reality. It has ignored the substance while pursuing mere shadow. CAN cannot address the issue.

‎"We therefore put it to CAN that its approach is escapist, cowardly and emotion-laden. It will not sell. How can CAN leave the offender to query the whistle blower? What kind of examination malpractice panel will ignore the candidate who cheats to sanction the invigilator who merely did his job as required?

‎"Who does that? How can CAN do this to Nigeria? How can CAN brush aside the issue of reporting Nigeria to America while focusing on those who interrogated the report as well as the reporter? How can CAN leave the tangential for the peripheral? How can CAN?

‎"Instead of denying or confirming that Amupitan wrote the false and incriminating legal brief, CAN ignored the subject matter and turned round to accusedaccuse the Shari'ah Council of politicising religion. But is that the issue?

 

“The question is whether Amupitan wrote the legal brief or not. CAN sidestepped the issue, dribbling, gangling, grandstanding and maradonising. CAN cannot address the issue.

 

“Amupitan is only lucky that his Satanic brief was not uncovered until he was given the INEC appointment otherwise he would never have scaled through. But he does not have to be a Kenyan before knowing that it is not yet Uhuru.

‎"It is now crystal clear that Northern CAN seeks to sweep Amupitan's treasonable offence under the carpet. Yet Northern CAN knows that it is defending the indefensible. That is why it cannot mention the offence committed by Professor Amupitan. A man committed the grave offence of treason against his country, yet CAN is encouraging him. CAN is defending him.

‎"Let us look around the world and see the fate of those who betrayed their countries? They were charged with treason, sedition or espionage and sentenced to long-term imprisonment or executed. 

‎"Edmund Campion, one of the Forty Martyrs of England and Wales, was executed in 1577 for high treason. Guy Fawkes, the English Catholic, was hanged for treason in 1606. The Norwegian Vidkun Quisling, though a former minister of defense in Norway, he later became a spy for the Nazis. He was executed after Germany surrendered in 1945, etc, etc.

 

“Yet we are not asking for the prosecution of Amupitan. No, we are not so vindictive. But only a fool is bitten in the same snake hole twice. We are simply expressing our fear. Nigerian Muslims do not trust this INEC boss, Professor Joash Amupitan. Give us another Christian (from the same North Central if you like). But for us, Amupitan is bad market. We will not touch him with a long pole. Or have we asked for too much?

“A man who writes such frivolous fiction against peace-loving and law-abiding Muslims should not be allowed to decide the fate of the same Muslims. ‎It will amount to gross injustice, executive impunity and deliberate provocation if the Federal Government (FG) ignores the complaints of Muslims against Amupitan on this matter. Already, more than four mainstream Islamic organizations have demanded the removal of the INEC boss. The umbrella organization of Nigerian Muslims was the first to condemn his unpatriotic action.

 

"What else does CAN want to know about those opposing Amupitan's headship of INEC? The Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs  (NSCIA) condemned his legal brief.  The Shari'ah Council complained openly. MURIC demanded his removal three times within the last two months. The Muslim Media Watch Group (MMWG) called for his sack yesterday. What else does CAN want to know?

 

“All Muslim groups are saying the same thing, namely, Amupitan must go. He has become an existential threat to Islamdom as far as democratic enfranchisement is concerned. Our frank advice to FG is to let Amupitan go. We warn that no good surgeon will hesitate to amputate a rotten part of the anatomy knowing that failure to do so may cause the infection to spread to all parts of the body.

 

“The Northern Christian body also questioned the motive behind the demand for the removal of Amupitan and wanted to know those sponsoring the call and why such interests are hiding behind the platform of a religious body. We wonder who told CAN that we are in hiding.

 

"We are not hiding. Our identities are well known and we are speaking out loud and clear. We are exercising our fundamental human rights of freedom of expression. The champions of free speech in the United States and the European Union know it even if it is not in their cardinal principle that Muslims should enjoy such rights.

‎"There is concrete evidence of the 80-page legal brief penned by Amupitan and it is replete with lies, hate speech and disdain for Northern Muslims. Amupitan himself has not denied it. ‎Even CAN avoided the main issue, neither denying nor confirming Amupitan's spiteful, mean, petty and parochial petition.

‎“We are not surprised anyway. We are not surprised that Northern CAN is supporting Amupitan. Didn’t CAN itself betray President Bola Ahmed Tinubu by the same attitude and with the same clandestine reports to the United States about Christian genocide in Nigeria?

 

“Was CAN unaware of the likely backlash on the Nigerian leader and the generality of the Nigerian people, if not a la Panama, then a la Venezuela? But did the thought hold them back? A president who risked everything, a man who bent over backwards to give them almost all the gold and diamond in the land of the rising sun was betrayed by them. So what are we saying?

 

“We are worried that Northern CAN leadership has failed to learn from the pages of the Bible: Judas betrayed Jesus (peace be upon him Mathew 26:47-56). Joseph was betrayed by his brothers (Genesis 37:23-28). Samson was betrayed by Delilah (Judges 16:4-21) while David was given away by his own son Absalom (2 Samuel 15-18). Yet our neighbours will not ponder over the fate of those biblical traitors.

 

“Already, many Nigerians are asking: Et tu CAN? But MURIC is not surprised. Birds of the same feather flock together. Treachery is in some people’s Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA.). Like Quisling, like Guy Fawkes. Like Amupitan, like Northen CAN. CAN is beating around the bush. CAN cannot address the issue. No, CAN cannot.”

 

#CANAddressTheIssue

‎#CANCannot

 

‎Professor Ishaq Akintola,

‎Founder/Executive Director,

‎Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC).