This is the official blog of the Nigeria-based Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), a human rights organization which promotes, protects and projects the rights of Muslims. This group condemns terrorism and all acts of violence. Its motto is 'Dialogue, Not Violence'
Thursday, May 12, 2016
NLC THREAT OF SHOWDOWN OVER DEREGULATION: DIALOGUE IS BETTER
12th May, 2016,
NLC THREAT OF SHOWDOWN OVER
DEREGULATION: DIALOGUE IS BETTER
The Federal Government (FG) yesterday announced the deregulation of the
oil sector. The price of oil was raised from N85 per litre to N145 and below. A
tornado of criticisms has greeted the new price and the Nigeria Labour Congress
(NLC) has threatened a showdown with FG.
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) calls on all stakeholders, particularly NLC, to
do a critical analysis of the situation and adopt dialogue instead of open
confrontation with the government on the issue.
We call attention to FG’s sober statement in which it described the decision
to increase the price of petrol as ‘difficult and painful’. We regard such
statement as emanating from a government which has feelings for the citizenry
and considers itself as part of the masses.
is an urgent need to recall the characteristics of good governance so far
demonstrated by President Buhari’s administration. It has checked financial
recklessness in the public sector. It has also imposed disciplinary measures on
Exempli gratia, some ministers are still squatting
in Abuja because President Muhammadu Buhari refused to approve N200 million for
each minister as done in past administrations. A ban has been placed on foreign
medical treatment and travelling first class in aircrafts for public officials.
Any government which takes these steps deserves the support of civil society
and the ordinary citizens, not its antagonism. We should understand the
difference between a financially prudent administration and a reckless and an
overtly corrupt regime.
We therefore appeal to the NLC and the rest of civil
society to adopt dialogue in the present circumstance. Civil society needs responsible
leadership at this critical moment. It is true that we are the voice of the voiceless
and defenders of the poor and downtrodden. But we are not just there to make
noise arbitrarily. Good governance should be complemented with responsible and
mature approach on the part of civil society.
Activists should not just make noise for the sake of
making their presence felt. Neither should we dissipate energy unnecessarily.
It is when we show understanding that we are being reasonable. It is irrational
to go all out when government puts all the cards on the table for all to see.
We are not enemies of the government. We are here to complement government’s
efforts as partners in progress.
Civil society should therefore sit down to objectively
appraise the situation. We should try to understand the raison d’etre for the removal of subsidy which includes the subsidy
fraud phenomenon and the cabal behind it, the free fall in oil price, etc…
Although critics may argue that Nigerians should rise
against the removal of oil subsidy because they resisted same during the
Jonathan administration, we contend that the situation is now different and the
same parameters cannot be applied. There was no fall in oil price when the ex-President
removed oil subsidy. Nigeria was producing 2.4 million barrels of oil daily,
selling at $93.61 per barrel, earning $224 million per day and $81 billion per
The scenario has since changed for the worse and Buhari is now
neck-deep in crisis management. As at 7th May 2016, Nigeria produced
2.7 million barrels per day and sold at $42.3 per barrel.
Whereas corruption was Nigeria’s middle name during the
Jonathan era, the Buhari regime is globally certified as transparent and
credible. We all should feel proud that both the Archbishop of Canterbury and
Transparency International rose to Nigeria’s defence two days ago when David
Cameron derogatorily referred to Nigeria as one of the two most corrupt nations
of the world.
Only the tiny cabal would have benefitted from removal of
subsidy under Jonathan. This informed the mass demonstrations at that time. But
poor Nigerians stand to benefit if subsidy is removed under a transparent
leader. That is why we do not need to agitate over the current increase. It is
a difficult phase that will pass onto prosperity.
These are the yardsticks which objective critics and
members of the civil society should be looking at. Not sentiments, not gallery
dancing, not grandstanding. We should not play into the hands of corrupt politicians
whose executive agent provocateurcum enfantterrible has already started inciting the NLC against FG.
Finally, we charge FG to set the machinery in motion for
dialogue with NLC. We appeal to civil society, the press and all Nigerians to
continue to support the central government in its quest to make life more
meaningful to all.
Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)