1st February, 2019
ONNOGHENGATE: PRESIDENCY
NEEDS SOLOMONIC WISDOM
A 12-man team of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has reportedly met with Vice President Yemi Osinbajo following the suspension of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen. The meeting allegedly took place early on Monday, 28th January, 2019 and the subject-matter was how to get a soft landing for the suspended CJN.
Among the options suggested by the team were the following:
1. CJN to resign or retire without coercion;
2. Govt to withdraw all charges against Onnoghen.
3. No molestation of CJN under any guise;
4. Acting CJN should quit.
5. NBA team to prevail on relatives, friends to persuade Justice
Onnoghen to resign.
6. Consensus on the need to clean up the Judiciary (long term
measure).
Meanwhile the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC), an Islamic human rights organization, has accepted option 6 in its entirety. The group also agreed with option 1 with an amendment. It rejected options 2 and 4; described option 3 as superfluous, suggestive and ill-motivated. The group regards option 5 as ridiculous, laughable and unsavoury.
The statement which was issued on Friday evening 1st February, 2019 was signed by the founder and director of the organization, Professor Ishaq Akintola.
MURIC said, “We accept option number 1 with an amendment. We have always said that the suspended CJN must resign. Retirement is not on the table. But the idea of ‘without coercion’ is outrageous. Who has been coercing the suspended CJN? Who has this administration coerced before? It is obvious that the NBA team came with a mindset and that is not good enough in dialogue. Why should they start with name-calling? Who are they trying to label as a tyrant? That option should be reviewed. Onnoghen should resign not only in the interest of the nation but also to save the judiciary from this monumental embarrassment.
“Option 2 is unacceptable. Why should government withdraw all charges? Now we can see how unnecessary plea-bargaining begins. We usually forget that every celebrated matter like this one, particularly those involving public figures and government officials are always placed first in the court of public opinion. Lawyers may bring technicalities but Nigerians are not fools.
“The man in the street is going to ask for the rationale for dropping charges. The number of criminals will increase because people are angry that a whole CJN allegedly got 55 houses in Abuja city alone with more than N1.1 billion cash in the kitty by robbing with the pen. So why shouldn’t armed robbers rob with the gun? This suggestion brings the contradictions in our society more clearly and rudely to the forefront. It should not be tried because it will create another bad precedent. This is a case in which government has to be firm. How do we create a deterrent for others? We have no doubt that other judges who have the noun ‘thief’ and the verb ‘to steal’ will expect plea bargain championed by the NBA in future?
Option 3 is superfluous, malicious, suggestive and ill-motivated. NBA is asking government not to molest the CJN. It is also implied in option 1. What exactly does NBA mean by molestation? Does the NBA think Nigerians will continue to respect this administration if the Federal Government (FG) announces a national award for the suspended CJN just as some people did in the past? What we know of this regime is that it upholds human dignity, freedom of the press, free speech and the rule of law. What else does NBA want for the suspended billionaire CJN?
“Option 4 is a satanic option. It offends the principle of natural justice. Why should the new acting CJN resign? What offence has he committed?Is it a crime to be a Northerner? NBA should eschew ethnic jingoism. We are not unaware of hate speeches in video clips targeted at the new acting CJN but we do not expect NBA to buy into tribal particularism. We believe in a united Nigeria. We respect and love lawyers but we love Nigeria more. We do not expect less from our lawyers.
“NBA’s satanic option 4 is reminiscent of the story of
the two women who brought their case to Prophet Daud (peace be upon him). A
wolf had taken one of the children away and there was a dispute concerning
whose child was still alive. Prophet Daud declared the older woman as the owner
but Prophet Sulayman (peace be upon him) who was the son of Daud and whom Allah
gave more wisdom than his father reviewed the judgement.
“He said, ‘Bring me a knife so as to
cut the child into two pieces and distribute it between them’. Although the
older lady agreed, the younger lady said, `May Allah be merciful to you. Don’t
do that, give the child to her, it is hers. Sulayman knew instantly that the
younger lady who did not want the child to die was the true owner. So he gave
the child to her (Qur’an 38:30 – 34; Sahih Bukhari
1:487; I Kings 3:16 – 28).
“So who deserves the post of CJN between Justice
Onnoghen and Justice Muhammed Tanko? Whose child was carried away by the wolf,
Onnoghen or Tanko? NBA wants the child cut in two halves! NBA has surprised us with
this strange suggestion. Who has a case to answer? Who abused his office? Who
is the billionaire CJN? How many days has Tanko spent in office as acting CJN? Is
it possible for eminent members of the NBA to also join the camp of haters and
wailers? Why are we like this in this country? Who cursed Nigeria?
“We are confounded by option 5. NBA is pledging to ‘prevail’ on relatives, friends will ‘persuade’
Justice Onnoghen to resign. We reject this option. It is
infantile, pedestrian and preposterous. NBA is spoon-feeding Onnoghen. What
concerns the Nigerian public with ‘relatives’ and ‘friends’ in this matter? So
NBA wants a whole Nigeria with 200 million people to start prostrating for a
single person? Must we prostrate for a cow because we want to eat beef? Is that
it? Should it be so? No, it had better not be. Nigeria is bigger than the
suspended CJN. How can such a peripheral issue supplant the tangential?
“We are not surprised though. We are not surprised
because NBA has decided long ago that it would ignore the substance and treat
the symptom. As far as NBA is concerned, Justice Onnoghen is a saint. He must
be idolized. MURIC rejects this stance. It is an attempt to turn Onnoghengate to a comedy. That suggestion
should be sent to Nollywood or reserved for the senator who spent 19 hours on
treetop. We are being serious here please.
“Option number 6 concerning the need to clean up the judiciary appears to us to make the most sense. Our judiciary stinks and a total overhauling of the system is long overdue. This should be done as soon as possible.
“We appeal to the NBA to call a spade a spade. The body of lawyers
should avoid spite and the pull-them-down syndrome. NBA appears to be cutting
its nose in order to spite its face. This seems to be what the association is
doing by trying to extenuate the offence committed by Justice Onnoghen while demonising
Justice Tanko. Is the NBA not biased? Isn’t Justice Tanko also a member of the
legal body? How should we judge an association that treats one member as a
sacred cow and pushes another onto the rail line when a train is approaching at
full speed? It is the most odious and insidious segregation. NBA needs to
reassess itself.
“If Nigerians agree that our judiciary needs cleaning up, the man to do it is President Muhammadu Buhari. He has the necessary qualities for the task. The boldness, the determination, the ascetic mien and the incorruptibility are the effective weapons needed for the job and he already possesses them. But we are already in the twilight of his first term in office. Nigerians will definitely need him for a second term particularly to clean the Augean stable.
“As we rise from this intervention, MURIC charges the Federal
Government to immediately set in motion the machinery for overhauling the
Nigerian judiciary. It is a miscarriage of justice to ask the newly appointed
acting CJN to resign. He should continue his work. On the contrary, it is the
suspended CJN who should resign honourably now. The Presidency should apply
Solomonic wisdom to Onnoghengate by sparing the ‘innocent child’”.
Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)
No comments:
Post a Comment