Wednesday, June 7, 2017

REVOKE SHAMSUDEEN BALA’S PERMISSION FOR HAJJ



8th June 2017
PRESS RELEASE:
REVOKE SHAMSUDEEN BALA’S PERMISSION FOR HAJJ    

A Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday granted the son of former Federal Capital Territory (FCT) minister, Shamsudeen Bala, permission to travel for ‘Umrah (lesser hajj). Bala is standing trial on charges of money laundering to the tune of N1.2 billion.

The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) denounces the permission granted the accused. The trial judge has been misled. It is a miscarriage of justice and undue indulgence. Permission to travel abroad is usually given to accused persons on medical grounds. Religion is not strong enough as reason for granting an accused person leave to travel outside the country. 


This is a flimsy excuse. The accused is not even going for hajj (pilgrimage) but for ‘Umrah which is lesser hajj. It is rather unfortunate that Nigerians engage in reckless abuse of religion and hide behind it to commit atrocities.


Whereas hajj is the last of the five pillars of Islam, Nigerian Muslims make it their first priority. Whereas hajj is compulsory only once in a life time, Nigerian Muslims compel themselves to go every year. Whereas the Qur’an makes it explicitly clear that hajj is only compulsory on those who have the wherewithal (Glorious Qur’an 3:97), even poverty-stricken Nigerian Muslims bend over backwards to look for money by all means to travel to Makkah. It is only hajj officials who should be permitted to go annually.


This is an aberration and it is an area the Nigerian authorities should focus on. Efforts should be geared towards proper education of Nigerians about their religions. Inadequate or improper knowledge about one’s religion is what usually leads to wrong perception, religious extremism, violence and terrorism.


Whereas ‘Umrah is not compulsory, thousands of Nigerian Muslims throng to Saudi Arabia to perform it every year. Many of them repeat the same exercise on an annual basis even though it costs no less than one million naira for each person. This constitutes serious drain on the nation’s foreign exchange while it boosts Saudi Arabia’s economy.


MURIC therefore finds no justification whatsoever for somebody who is on trial for money laundering to seek permission to go on ‘Umrah and for that frivolous request to be granted. It is sheer misplacement of priorities. Although Shamsudeen Bala remains innocent until he is found guilty, it appears the accused is being unduely rewarded for having the temerity to steal Nigeria’s money.


That N1.2 billion which is in contention will go a long way in ameliorating the sufferings of thousands of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in the North East or pay the tuition fees of hundreds of indigent students in Nigerian universities. N1 billion is N1 million in one thousand places and we are talking of N1.2 billion, not just N1 billion. It is a fabulous amount of money in a country where the minimum wage is a paltry N18,000 and many Nigerians do not know what they will eat tomorrow.


The average Nigerian lives on less than $1 per day. Our per capita income is less than $300. Nigeria is the 26th hungriest country in the world. We are the 20th poorest nation yet the most ‘fantastically corrupt’.


Bala should thank Allah that he is not behind bars. He should stay at home and pray to Allah from here. Allah is everywhere. He is near, not far. He is alive, powerful, wonderful. He does not sleep. He hears the cries of His servants whenever they call Him (Qur’an 2:186, 255) .


Before we round up, we assert that MURIC will not celebrate corrupt Muslims. They should clear themselves in the law courts first. We urge the learned judge to revoke the permission to travel granted Bala. We charge religious leaders to stop idolising people whose sources of income are uncertain, people of doubtful character and those facing corruption charges until they are discharged and acquitted. In the same vein, we should desist from pampering them with chieftaincy and religious titles, protecting them or seeking to extenuate their offences.



Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)


Tuesday, June 6, 2017

MASQUERADE ATTACK ON MOSQUE: YORUBA MUSLIMS ARE BEING PROVOKED



6th June 2017
PRESS RELEASE:
MASQUERADE ATTACK ON MOSQUE: YORUBA MUSLIMS ARE BEING PROVOKED     


Masquerades attacked Muslims inside the Central Mosque in Ikun Ekiti, Moba Local Government Area of Ekiti state on Tuesday, 30th May, 2017. The incident occurred around 7 pm in the evening when the Muslims had just broken their fast and they were observing the Maghrib prayer. Several worshippers were injured and some of them were hospitalized after the attack. Two cars parked outside the mosque were damaged. The mosque also suffered damage.


The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) strongly condemns this attack on peace-loving and law-abiding Muslims. It is most barbaric, most provocative and highly unacceptable.


This attack cannot be isolated from the hostile and belligerent attitude of the governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, towards Muslims in the state as well as their mosques. We are inclined to declare that the masquerades who attacked Muslims inside their mosques in Ikun Ekiti took the cue from the governor’s open hostility towards Ekiti Muslims and his determination to destroy mosques in the state. It is already clear that Fayose has declared Muslims in the state as persona non grata and their mosques legitimate targets for destruction.   


MURIC therefore charges the Inspector General of Police (IGP) to wade into the matter before the total breakdown of law and order in the state. We demand immediate arrest and prosecution of the culprits. This will discourage reprisal attacks by those who feel that they have been victimized.


The fact that the Muslims were attacked inside their mosque is quite instructive. The masqueraders alleged that they had warned the Muslims not to pray during their Egungun festival. They claimed that the adhan (Muslim call to prayer) that was called provoked them.


This is nauseating. When did the Muslims’ adhan turn into a weapon of mass destruction? Who did the adhan injure? How can the prayers being offered by Muslims inside their own mosque become pernicious to the masquerades who were passing by? The worship of one faithful should not deter another from his own worship.


We admit that the masquerades have a right to mark their festival. But their right stops where that of the Muslims starts. Egungun worshippers have no right under the sun to enter the mosque in the first place, talk less of going there to attack those inside with dangerous weapons. Their right to hold a rally and go round the city of Ikun Ekiti stops at the doorsteps of the mosque. They can pass by but they should not enter the mosque.


Every Nigerian knows the times that Muslims observe prayers. Those masquerades or their sponsors have no right to ask Muslims to suspend their prayer because they want to pass. We Muslims love our neighbours and we are prepared to coexist peacefully but on equal terms. We are not second class citizens and we will not accept intimidation of any kind.


We assert the right of Muslims to call the adhan and pray at the scheduled times. No homo sapien should deprive them of this Allah-given fundamental human right. Freedom of religion is firmly entrenched in the Nigerian constitution, not freedom for one religion to laud it over the other. Section 38 (i) & (ii) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria is very clear about this.  


This attack has blown the lid off the myth of religious tolerance in the South West. There is nothing like it. Muslims are facing persecution in Yorubaland. The wind has blown. We have seen the ruff of the hen. The reality is that religious tolerance in the South West is restricted to relations, colleagues at work and known faces.


This is why Muslims and Christians may live together in the same house without fighting. It does not extend to unknown faces. It does not accommodate the institution of religion itself. Religious tolerance in the South West is therefore a farce, a mirage. Unless something is done urgently to address this ugly phenomenon, religious crisis in the South West hangs above our heads like the sword of Damocles.


For instance, none of the masquerades who attacked the Muslims inside their mosque on that day will fight any of his siblings at home for being a Muslim. Neither will he attack his Muslim colleague at work. But he will be among the first to cry foul if Muslims make any demand as a corporate body. There is no genuine love, no real tolerance. This is the bitter truth.


It is therefore high time the wings of traditional worshippers were clipped. They arrogate illegitimate powers to themselves, e.g. by unilaterally declaring curfews for the purpose of rituals. No followers of one religion should have the power to restrict the movements of adherents of another religion. Yet this is what traditional religionists have been doing over the years. The police often ignore this breach of the law and allow traditionalists to unleash reign of terror on law-abiding citizens.


Yet again we have a lesson to draw here. This kind of incident is what often leads to terrorism. Muslims are often accused of being violent. Our contention is that violence or terrorism is ordinary smoke and there can never be smoke without fire. The fire of terrorism is provocation. Those who deride Muslims, those who stigmatise them and those who encroach on Allah-given and fundamental human rights of Muslims are the real terrorists. Worse still, law enforcement agents who refuse to take action against those who provoke Muslims are equally culpable. What action has the Ekiti Police Command taken after the brutalization of Muslims by masquerades in Ikun Ekiti mosque?


As we round up, we call on the IGP to quickly wade into the furore. Masquerades who attacked Muslims inside the mosque in Ikun Ekiti must be arrested and prosecuted for, breaking and entering, willful damage, thuggery, hooliganism, attempted murder and breach of the peace. The Nigerian Police must nip illegal curfews in the bud by making a strong statement banning unauthorised curfew anywhere in Nigeria.


Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)


Thursday, June 1, 2017

NYSC RAMADAN CAMP: RESPECT MUSLIM LEADERS



1st June 2017
PRESS RELEASE:
NYSC RAMADAN CAMP: RESPECT MUSLIM LEADERS   


The 2017 camping exercise of the Nigerian Youth Service Corp (NYSC) commenced last week throughout the federation despite serious objections raised by the umbrella body of all Islamic organizations in the country, the Nigerian Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs (NSCIA).


A similar objection raised last year led to an agreement between NYSC authorities and Muslim leaders that NYSC would not make further attempts to camp youth corpers during Ramadan in subsequent years. Although the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) contacted NYSC leadership a few weeks before the camping started after receiving complaints from prospective Muslim corpers, we were assured that all stakeholders had been consulted. But it is now clear that differences still exist.


MURIC is therefore disappointed with the recalcitrance of the NYSC leadership whose demeanor depicted gross disrespect for the opinion of the topmost echelon of the NSCIA. We affirm that the leader of all Nigerian Muslims is the Sultan of Sokoto and President-General of the NSCIA, His Eminence, Alhaji Muhammad Sa’ad Abubakar III. The Sultan has the inalienable right and non-abdicatable, undeniable responsibility in loco parentis to look after the welfare of Nigerian Muslims. You cannot treat Muslims with disdain and expect the Sultan to keep quiet.


The fact that the Sultan’s advice was ignored in this matter is rather unfortunate, nay preposterous and therefore unacceptable. It should never happen again. Whoever rebuffs the Sultan has rebuffed all Nigerian Muslims. Whoever disrespects our leader should not expect any cooperation from us. The Nigerian Muslim Ummah is no longer what it used to be. The old order has changed. The current leadership has taken us to the next level.


Without being aggressive or abusive, without issuing threats or heating up the polity, the new leadership of the past ten years has been able to reengineer the Muslim Ummah’s rank and file. We live and let live. We tolerate, forgive and love. Yet we still reject outright infringement on our Allah-given fundamental human rights and attempts to cause unnecessary discomfort to Muslims to the advantage of people of other faiths.


The fact that the current leadership of the NYSC is a Muslim is instructive in this case. The issue is not the faith of the agency instrumental to causing injury, stigma or discomfort to Muslims. We address issues, not sentiment or personality. It is a matter of principle. In fact a non-Muslim may be in that post tomorrow. Is it ideal to keep quiet now that our brother is there but to start shouting when a non-Muslim becomes the director general and he does the same thing? Islam is about justice and fairness.


That is why we are objecting to NYSC camping during this 2017 Ramadan in spite of the fact that the current leadership of the scheme is a fellow Muslim. That is objectivity. Nobody should express surprise tomorrow if we oppose a policy which we deem pernicious to Muslim interest under a non-Muslim chief executive in any agency. We will not oppose it because the chief executive is not a Muslim but because it is based on principle.


Nigerians must learn to do what is right at all times. We must be just to all. The Nigerian society must be egalitarian. Christian sensibilities bust be respected. Muslim interests and those of other faiths must be respected. In the interest of peace and harmony, Nigerian authorities must always take the nation’s religious and ethnic diversities into consideration. All anti-Muslim tabula rasa must therefore be revisited. Without issuing threats, we are constrained to reiterate that from now on, NIGERIAN MUSLIMS WILL TAKE EVERY CONSTITUTIONAL STEP NECESSARY TO STOP MUSLIM CORPERS FROM BEING CAMPED DURING RAMADAN.


As we round up, we remind NYSC leadership of the pledge made to MURIC leadership that adequate care will be taken of fasting Muslim corpers in the 2017 camps all over the country. We advise NYSC leadership to avoid picking controversial dates for its future camping exercises. We appeal to Muslim corpers who are currently in camp to be good ambassadors of Islam, to eschew all immoralities and to remain peaceful and law-abiding.  


Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)

Sunday, May 28, 2017

GIVE US JUNE 12, NOT MAY 29



28th May, 2017
PRESS RELEASE:
GIVE US JUNE 12, NOT MAY 29


The Federal Government has declared Monday, 29th May, 2017 as a holiday to mark this year’s Democracy Day.    


The Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) rejects May 29 as Nigeria’s Democracy Day. It is fraudulent, unrealistic and escapist.


May 29 was picked by the last military regime of General Abdul Salaam Abubakar because it marked the day that the military handed over power to civilians after decades of military dictatorship. But the soul of Nigerians is in the June 12, 1993 general election whose result was criminally annulled by the military.


It is our considered opinion that June 12 should be Nigeria’s real Democracy Day because June 12 election was adjudged by both local and international observers as the most orderly, most peaceful and most democratic election in the annals of Nigeria’s history. That election remains celebrated today as the only one that was free of rigging, ballot box snatching, thuggery, hooliganism and other related ugly incidents.


June 12 1993 was the day all Nigerians decided to sink religious and ethnic differences. They voted for the Muslim – Muslim ticket of Chief M. K. O. Abiola and Babagana Kingibe. Nigerians spoke with one voice on that memorable day from Enugu to Kaora Namoda and from Sokoto to Bayelsa. The churches rejoiced with the mosques on June 12 1993 and Nigeria truly became one.   


One of the reasons for our failure to resolve the problems facing Nigeria is the inability of our leadership to face reality, to admit mistakes and to made amends. May 29 was a grievous mistake. June 12 is the way forward. If we do not know where we are going, at least we know where we are coming from. June 12 is where we are coming from. Let us go back to it in order to jog our people’s memory, ignite their passion and rekindle their patriotism.


Those who picked May 29 merely wish to switch attention from our collective will. May 29 is enslavement and captivity. June 12 is freedom and liberty. It symbolizes unity and epitomizes unconditional love. It is emancipation from the claws of bourgeois politics, ethnic jingoism and corruption unlimited.


June 12 removed the veil from our eyes. It taught us to seek leadership in competence, integrity and decency, not mediocrity, religious affiliation or ethnicity. On June 12 we stand.   


In conclusion, MURIC urges the Federal Government and the ruling party to keep faith with the change mantra by going back to June 12. Nigerians were promised change. We want that change to manifest in the day recognized as Democracy Day. It must be the people’s day, not the day picked by a tiny cabal. It must be the day of unity. It must be the day of unlimited love. Give us June 12.


Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)