27th
May, 2015
PRESS
RELEASE:
WE REJECT JONATHAN AS ‘ADVOCATE OF
PEACE’
While we agree that there is every need
for peaceful coexistence, we of the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) regard Mr.
President’s latest declaration as immodest, belated, hypocritical and an
absolute afterthought.
President
Jonathan’s request to become an ambassador of peace is baffling. People do not ask
for honour. It is given freely, willingly and spontaneously.
Honour is earned through quality
leadership, not demanded and snatched via rough tackles and arm-twisting. People
who are truly honourable do not lobby for it. The quality of honour is like the
golden fish. Honour has no place to hide.
People will see it wherever it is
even without showing itself. So why is our outgoing president parading himself
as a peace ambassador?
A
peace ambassador must be acceptable to all parties but the case of Jonathan is
different. He is not acceptable as an ambassador to Nigerian Muslims.
We cannot accept Jonathan as a go-between
in matters affecting us and our Christian neighbours because his sins against
us are so many that we have stopped counting.
But we continued to respect him because
of his exalted office. We believe that respect for the office of Mr. President
is respect for our country, Nigeria.
MURIC
complained when President Jonathan marginalized Muslims in ministerial and
other appointments. We cried out when Jonathan turned his national conference
to an overwhelmingly Christian conference. There are many more.
Just recently
and a few days to handing over to a new administration, Jonathan gave Nigerian
Muslims a direct slap on the face when he selected members of the National Hajj
Commission of Nigeria (NAHCON) without consulting Muslim leaders at all. How
can Jonathan shave our heads in our absence? No good ambassador will do this.
It
means that if he becomes ambassador of peace, at worst, he would just sit down
in Otuoke, invite the Christians and take a decision without meeting the
Muslims. Or, at best, he would ignore the recognized leadership of Nigerian
Muslims and simply handpick the minority Muslims in his state to represent all
the Muslims of Nigeria. Respect begets respect. Jonathan has forgotten that
people below are watching those on top.
How can Jonathan be an ambassador of
peace? His militant kinsmen threatened the rest of Nigeria with hell on earth
if he lost the election and he kept quiet. His wife publicly insulted
Northerners in particular and Nigerian Muslims in general calling us people who
produce children without caring for them and the husband kept mute. Jonathan
has no sense of justice. Neither can he call those under him to order. How can
such a man be crowned ambassador of peace?
Except the few political jobbers in his government, Nigerian
Muslims have no confidence in President Jonathan. How can we repose confidence
in him when we could not get justice, fairness and equal rights under him?
How
can we accept him as an ambassador of peace and a fair umpire when he was not
fair to us when he was in government. President Jonathan wants to be rewarded
for what he did not work for. He wants to sow where he did not reap. We will
not accept that.
Nigerian Muslims know political and religious leaders who
deserve their respect and who they can accept as ambassadors of peace. We do
not wish to be misunderstood. There are Christians among such leaders whom we
respect.
Even the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has produced leaders
who are devoid of prejudice and hatred against Nigerian Muslims. ArchBishop
John Onaiyekan, former CAN president is one of such leaders. Bishop Idowu
Fearon of Kaduna Diocese is another. There are many others.
Jonathan’s claim
to deserving ambassadorial honour between Christians and Muslims is false,
baseless and therefore unacceptable. In fact, by marginalizing Muslims and maltreating them, Jonathan
did more harm to Christians in Nigeria because those actions of malice against
Muslims stoked up anti-Christian sentiments in the minds of the former.
Any leader who engages in favouritism for people of his
own faith while ignoring those of another creed is setting the two groups
against each other. MURIC therefore advises the President-Elect, Muhammadu
Buhari, to pursue a policy of fairness and openness to all, to give unto
Christians all rights and priviledges due to them without forgetting the
demands and complaints of Muslims.
What Nigeria needs is not necessarily a Christian or a Muslim.
We need a leader with an iron will, a leader to whom riches mean nothing, a
leader who cares and feels for the jamaheer (masses), a leader who has zero
tolerance for corruption and utmost respect for the rule of law.
We advise President Jonathan to stop building castles in the air
and to face the reality on ground. He is not leaving office as a hero but as a
leader who messed up the economy of his country, glorified corruption and
divided Nigeria along religious and ethnic lines. How can such a man demand the
exalted position of a peace ambassador?
Finally, we urge the international community to ignore
Jonathan’s image-laundering efforts after his woeful performance in office. He
is not acceptable to Nigerian
Muslims as a peace ambassador. Rather, we regard him as one of the major causes
of Nigeria’s woes, an unmitigated disaster in Nigeria’s search for quality leadership
and the worst president Nigeria should never have had.
Professor
Ishaq Akintola,
Director,
Muslim
Rights Concern (MURIC)