PRESS CONFERENCE ON THE 2023 GENERAL ELECTIONS ORGANISED BY THE
MUSLIM RIGHTS CONCERN (MURIC) IN LAGOS ON TUESDAY, 28TH FEBRUARY,
2023.
PRESS CONFERENCE ON THE 2023 GENERAL ELECTIONS ORGANISED BY THE
MUSLIM RIGHTS CONCERN (MURIC) IN LAGOS ON TUESDAY, 28TH FEBRUARY,
2023.
NO TO ANOTH
ER JUNE 12 - MURIC
Distinguished
Muslim leaders,
Officials
and members of MURIC here present,
Gentlemen
of the Press.
As-Salaam
Alaykunm
Millions of Nigerians trooped out to exercise their
franchise yesterday, Saturday, 25th February, 2023 in a keenly
contested presidential election. Interestingly, the final results are still
being awaited as the nation’s electoral umpire, the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC) has been
announcing the results in trickles. Only 14 out of 36 states have been
announced as at Monday evening.
This delay
is quite unusual and it has been traced partly to some logistic problems being
faced by the electoral body at state level. But the lion share of the blame for
the delay must go to the party agents of two political parties, one of which is
Nigeria’s main opposition party.
Whereas
INEC had set up its situation room in Abuja by 12 noon on Sunday, 26th
February, 2023 and it has since adopted a business-like approach, the party
agents appear determined to constitute clogs in the wheel of progress.
Labour
Party whose result as announced by INEC showed that it was in the third
position with little chance of catching up actually demanded that INEC should
stop the collation exercise.
But the
agent of the main opposition party who had persistently protested against the
procedure and raised certain concerns with impertinence later staged a walkout
during the collation. We find this very disturbing and highly opinionated.
This attitude
stands in contradistinction with African values of decorum in public places. We
believe that anyone in the INEC situation room can ask questions or pass
comments but decency and moderation are mandatory. Nobody has the right to insist
on truncating the collation exercise of a presidential election in which
millions had participated just because he could not get his wish done
immediately.
Every institution
has its laid down rules and certain methods of resolving issues. There is a
pattern laid down for agents and their political parties for solving problems
encountered by them. That is what we call due process.
The
agent of the main opposition party expected too much from the INEC chairman
when he insisted that certain perceived errors in the documents submitted
should be corrected by the chairman on the floors of the situation room. The
chairman merely asked for due process to be followed and this drew the ire of
the agent. He therefore stormed out of the place.
This
behaviour is a sad reminder of the condescending behaviour of another agent of
the same party also during the collation of the results of the 2015
presidential election. It is unparliamentary.
It smirks
of gross desertification of vital qualities like patience and coolheadedness
which people who represent esteemed establishments should possess. Political
parties are advised to screen their agents and spokespersons with microscopic
accuracy before putting them on the assignment.
INEC
should not listen to these agents diaboli. The electoral body should not stop
the collation of results, rather the exercise should continue until all the
results are announced and certificates of return given to the winners. The same
continuity should be extended to gubernatorial as well as national and state assembly
elections.
We wish to
appeal to participants who are currently in the INEC situation room as well as
future participants to view their role as a serious national assignment that
cannot accommodate any form of reckless behaviour. They should note that the
tribunal is there to adjudicate in their grievances should there be any. We
charge political actors to weigh their words before uttering them so as not to
set the country on fire.
NO TO
ANOTHER JUNE 12
This is
another June 12 loading. Like Arthur Nzeribe headed for the courts in 1993 to
stop the announcement of results of the June 12 election, the agent of the main
opposition and his cohorts who stormed out of the collation centre is allegedly
looking for a court injunction to stop proceedings at the collation centre. This
was exactly how the June 12, 1993 election was annulled by the military. Anybody
who supports this move is dragging Nigeria back to the Stone Age. We say NO to
another June 12.
In this
regard, we denounce the unsolicited and jaundiced intervention of former
President Olusegun Obasanjo who called for the cessation of the collation of
results. We are nonplussed that a main beneficiary of democracy failed woefully
to respect democratic process. Obasanjo’s call is sacriledgious. It is a rape
of democracy. It is an attempted coup.
Obasanjo’s
sanctimonious façade comes crumbling down against the background of his role in
the enthronement of Musa Yaradua as president. The latter himself admitted that
he was rigged into office. Now we know it takes a rigger to see rigging even in
his sleep. Obasanjo is desperate because his anointed candidate has not
performed well at the polls. His intention is to force him on us. Obasanjo
wants to reap by the bends what he could not get by the straight.
Keen
observers will realise that it is those who know that they have lost the
election who are now calling for a halt to the collation of results. This is
not the way of real men. Neither is it the way of genuine democrats. It is
cowardly and escapist. There is honour in acceptance of defeat. Great politicians
do not hesitate to congratulate the winner when they lose elections. That is
true sportsmanship.
The
allegation of rigging coming from those who know that they are about to lose this
election is lame, baseless and unfounded. African politicians hide under the
umbrella of rigging when they have been beaten black and blue at the polls.
For
instance, President Muhammadu Buhari lost the election in Katsina, his home
state, during this same election. Did he also rig that? The presidential
candidate of the ruling party, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, lost his home base, Lagos.
People are already asking if Tinubu rigged himself out of Lagos. Even the national
chairman of the ruling party, Senator Adamu Abdullahi, lost his base in Nasarawa
State. Again, did Governor El-Rufai plot with riggers to rig him out in Kaduna
State?
In
Plateau State, the Director General of the Presidential Campaign Council of the
ruling party and state governor, Simon Lalong, lost the state and you still
have the temerity to accuse such a party of rigging the election. It really
beggars belief. A ruling party that is bent on rigging must first secure the party
chairman’s base. The governor of Yobe, Mai Mala Buni, was defeated. Did he rig
himself out? Did Senate spokesman who lost this election rig himself out? This
rigging allegation stands logic on its head. Why do you accept results when you
win but cry foul when you lose? It is a manifestation of double standard.
MURIC notes
with keen interest the way Governor Ortom of Benue State did an acrobatic
U-turn after discovering that the mandate went to a Southern Muslim. We commend
the two G-5 governors, Nyesom Wike of Rivers and Seyi Makinde of Oyo State for
working for the success of a Muslim-Muslim ticket. Governors Dapo Abiodun of
Ogun State, Rotimi Akeredolu of Ondo and Abayomi Oyebanji of Ekiti also deserve
our encomiums. Nigerian Muslims will not forget.
Equally
deserving of our panegyrics is INEC chairman, Professor Mahmood Yakubu,
particularly for taking the aggression of agents with equanimity.
We
advise international observers to pass their comments through diplomatic
channels so as not to ignite crisis in the country. Democracy is not perfect
even in sophisticated climes. International observers should not be swayed by Obasanjo’s
involvement. This man has no political relevance in Nigeria. He could not even
deliver his polling booth on Saturday to the candidate endorsed by him.
Experience
has also shown that no election is perfect. Russia is still under suspicion of
interrupting US election in 2017. Donald Trump’s January 6 insurrection has demystified
America’s myth of a perfect democracy. Britain has had four prime ministers in four
years. International observers should therefore act with utmost constraint and
caution.
In
conclusion, MURIC condemns attempts to disrupt the collation of 2023
presidential results. We charge politicians to give democracy a breathing
space. We advise losers to take graceful exits while winners are urged to be
magnanimous. In actual fact there is no winner, no vanquished in a national
election of this nature. The real winner is Nigeria so long as we allow peace
to reign. May Nigeria survive.
Long Live
The Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Gentlemen
of the press, thank you for listening.
Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Executive Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)
Distinguished
Muslim leaders,
Officials
and members of MURIC here present,
Gentlemen
of the Press.
As-Salaam
Alaykunm
Millions of Nigerians trooped out to exercise their
franchise yesterday, Saturday, 25th February, 2023 in a keenly
contested presidential election. Interestingly, the final results are still
being awaited as the nation’s electoral umpire, the Independent National
Electoral Commission (INEC) has been
announcing the results in trickles. Only 14 out of 36 states have been
announced as at Monday evening.
This delay
is quite unusual and it has been traced partly to some logistic problems being
faced by the electoral body at state level. But the lion share of the blame for
the delay must go to the party agents of two political parties, one of which is
Nigeria’s main opposition party.
Whereas
INEC had set up its situation room in Abuja by 12 noon on Sunday, 26th
February, 2023 and it has since adopted a business-like approach, the party
agents appear determined to constitute clogs in the wheel of progress.
Labour
Party whose result as announced by INEC showed that it was in the third
position with little chance of catching up actually demanded that INEC should
stop the collation exercise.
But the
agent of the main opposition party who had persistently protested against the
procedure and raised certain concerns with impertinence later staged a walkout
during the collation. We find this very disturbing and highly opinionated.
This attitude
stands in contradistinction with African values of decorum in public places. We
believe that anyone in the INEC situation room can ask questions or pass
comments but decency and moderation are mandatory. Nobody has the right to insist
on truncating the collation exercise of a presidential election in which
millions had participated just because he could not get his wish done
immediately.
Every institution
has its laid down rules and certain methods of resolving issues. There is a
pattern laid down for agents and their political parties for solving problems
encountered by them. That is what we call due process.
The
agent of the main opposition party expected too much from the INEC chairman
when he insisted that certain perceived errors in the documents submitted
should be corrected by the chairman on the floors of the situation room. The
chairman merely asked for due process to be followed and this drew the ire of
the agent. He therefore stormed out of the place.
This
behaviour is a sad reminder of the condescending behaviour of another agent of
the same party also during the collation of the results of the 2015
presidential election. It is unparliamentary.
It smirks
of gross desertification of vital qualities like patience and coolheadedness
which people who represent esteemed establishments should possess. Political
parties are advised to screen their agents and spokespersons with microscopic
accuracy before putting them on the assignment.
INEC
should not listen to these agents diaboli. The electoral body should not stop
the collation of results, rather the exercise should continue until all the
results are announced and certificates of return given to the winners. The same
continuity should be extended to gubernatorial as well as national and state assembly
elections.
We wish to
appeal to participants who are currently in the INEC situation room as well as
future participants to view their role as a serious national assignment that
cannot accommodate any form of reckless behaviour. They should note that the
tribunal is there to adjudicate in their grievances should there be any. We
charge political actors to weigh their words before uttering them so as not to
set the country on fire.
NO TO
ANOTHER JUNE 12
This is
another June 12 loading. Like Arthur Nzeribe headed for the courts in 1993 to
stop the announcement of results of the June 12 election, the agent of the main
opposition and his cohorts who stormed out of the collation centre is allegedly
looking for a court injunction to stop proceedings at the collation centre. This
was exactly how the June 12, 1993 election was annulled by the military. Anybody
who supports this move is dragging Nigeria back to the Stone Age. We say NO to
another June 12.
In this
regard, we denounce the unsolicited and jaundiced intervention of former
President Olusegun Obasanjo who called for the cessation of the collation of
results. We are nonplussed that a main beneficiary of democracy failed woefully
to respect democratic process. Obasanjo’s call is sacriledgious. It is a rape
of democracy. It is an attempted coup.
Obasanjo’s
sanctimonious façade comes crumbling down against the background of his role in
the enthronement of Musa Yaradua as president. The latter himself admitted that
he was rigged into office. Now we know it takes a rigger to see rigging even in
his sleep. Obasanjo is desperate because his anointed candidate has not
performed well at the polls. His intention is to force him on us. Obasanjo
wants to reap by the bends what he could not get by the straight.
Keen
observers will realise that it is those who know that they have lost the
election who are now calling for a halt to the collation of results. This is
not the way of real men. Neither is it the way of genuine democrats. It is
cowardly and escapist. There is honour in acceptance of defeat. Great politicians
do not hesitate to congratulate the winner when they lose elections. That is
true sportsmanship.
The
allegation of rigging coming from those who know that they are about to lose this
election is lame, baseless and unfounded. African politicians hide under the
umbrella of rigging when they have been beaten black and blue at the polls.
For
instance, President Muhammadu Buhari lost the election in Katsina, his home
state, during this same election. Did he also rig that? The presidential
candidate of the ruling party, Bola Ahmed Tinubu, lost his home base, Lagos.
People are already asking if Tinubu rigged himself out of Lagos. Even the national
chairman of the ruling party, Senator Adamu Abdullahi, lost his base in Nasarawa
State. Again, did Governor El-Rufai plot with riggers to rig him out in Kaduna
State?
In
Plateau State, the Director General of the Presidential Campaign Council of the
ruling party and state governor, Simon Lalong, lost the state and you still
have the temerity to accuse such a party of rigging the election. It really
beggars belief. A ruling party that is bent on rigging must first secure the party
chairman’s base. The governor of Yobe, Mai Mala Buni, was defeated. Did he rig
himself out? Did Senate spokesman who lost this election rig himself out? This
rigging allegation stands logic on its head. Why do you accept results when you
win but cry foul when you lose? It is a manifestation of double standard.
MURIC notes
with keen interest the way Governor Ortom of Benue State did an acrobatic
U-turn after discovering that the mandate went to a Southern Muslim. We commend
the two G-5 governors, Nyesom Wike of Rivers and Seyi Makinde of Oyo State for
working for the success of a Muslim-Muslim ticket. Governors Dapo Abiodun of
Ogun State, Rotimi Akeredolu of Ondo and Abayomi Oyebanji of Ekiti also deserve
our encomiums. Nigerian Muslims will not forget.
Equally
deserving of our panegyrics is INEC chairman, Professor Mahmood Yakubu,
particularly for taking the aggression of agents with equanimity.
We
advise international observers to pass their comments through diplomatic
channels so as not to ignite crisis in the country. Democracy is not perfect
even in sophisticated climes. International observers should not be swayed by Obasanjo’s
involvement. This man has no political relevance in Nigeria. He could not even
deliver his polling booth on Saturday to the candidate endorsed by him.
Experience
has also shown that no election is perfect. Russia is still under suspicion of
interrupting US election in 2017. Donald Trump’s January 6 insurrection has demystified
America’s myth of a perfect democracy. Britain has had four prime ministers in four
years. International observers should therefore act with utmost constraint and
caution.
In
conclusion, MURIC condemns attempts to disrupt the collation of 2023
presidential results. We charge politicians to give democracy a breathing
space. We advise losers to take graceful exits while winners are urged to be
magnanimous. In actual fact there is no winner, no vanquished in a national
election of this nature. The real winner is Nigeria so long as we allow peace
to reign. May Nigeria survive.
Long Live
The Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Gentlemen
of the press, thank you for listening.
Professor Ishaq Akintola,
Executive Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)